| |
character was also trying to dance
Cast your doubts aside!
Dancing while in combat was disabled to fix some unfortunate animation bugs. For example, several races do a torso twist as part of their special attack animation, and that would go haywire when the character was also trying to dance.
Part of what makes WoW a compelling experience is the sense of immersion in this alternate world, and that is or wow a sense that can be disrupted by graphic glitches.
We definitely hear the outcry over the dancing in combat. Our tactic is going to be to try to let characters dance while they are in combat, and always break the dance when a foe is engaged (so you could dance while in combat, but only when your character is idle). We are just starting to investigate this solution, but I can assure you that it is being evaluated. I’ve heard that directly from the mouths of the devs.
Having said that, we realize there are plenty of other areas in the game where the art can get into a less than optimal state, and nobody should assume that we just don’t care about those – they are all on the radar.
this if it's been fixed and he is just bad
Just as a note - a guildy of mine (83 ret pally) was unable to complete this quest as of last night. He was dpsing and healing his butt off but couldn't keep Cenarius from dropping. I jumped in to try and help but I was phased, so he tried the tactic of cursing and skipping the quest for now. It seemed to work.
I'm not saying it's for sure still broken, acheter wow gold but he doesn't strike me as not competent enough to finish this quest - it was pretty easy on each of the three toons I did it on.
I'll feel really stupid having posted this if it's been fixed and he is just bad.
thinking about it We'll get back to you
The Q&As are designed so that we answer the top rated questions that the community has. Sometimes though, the questions asked aren't ones we can answer for you directly, but we try to answer what we can. So the choice is either to pretend that those questions online wow po don't exist and avoid them (even though they were highly rated) or to give whatever answer we can, even if it's just "We like it. We're thinking about it. We'll get back to you."
What we're trying to do is to give you some insight into what the development team is thinking and the processes involved. Sometimes that means giving an answer that explains why we don't want to do something or why something might be difficult to do. This is not putting off the question. It's just our way of trying to explain why we don't have a better answer for you at the time. We're trying to be as transparent as possible, but at the same time, there will always be some gray areas that even we are trying to sort out and we'd rather not mislead or give false hopes if we can avoid it. We'd much rather give what solid answers we can as we can when we can and when we get further along in design, talk about what we are able to do and doing then.
When we started these Q&As, we knew that disappointing people now and then with answers was something that would happen. But, we feel the benefits of doing these outweigh the negatives by far. We'd rather face the danger rather than run away away.
in some form or fashion
This forum (General Discussion) is a good place to post suggestions. I think you'll find that a lot of the threads started here are suggestions in some form or fashion.
Your specific issue would have also gotten an answer in the Customer Support forum ( http://us.battle.net/wow/en/forum/1011699/ ), because it happened to be about a function that can be disabled in-game. The settings you're looking for (and have hopefully already found) are in "Esc" / "Interface" / "Social". That is where you can control what happens when guild members log on and off, you receive whispers, whether you see chat bubbles, and so forth.
This is also the sort of thing that might have been appropriate for the UI and Macro forum ( http://us.battle.net/wow/en/forum/1011693/ ).
Have a nice day!
challenging for block-capped tanks it's impossible
So you've basically just said that DKs will need to stack Stamina at the expense of everything else in a world where block-capping occurs.
In order for a DK to be able maintain their survivability, they have to be able to survive the incoming damage first. If you intend to make the incoming damage challenging for block-capped tanks it's impossible.
Block capping presents two paths if it's not seen as a problem:
1) Block tanks take so little damage that they wow gold are by far the preferred tank for anything.
2) In order for block tanks to have anything resembling threatening incoming damage, DKs get 2-shotted.
I think there's a disconnect somewhere.
time at some point in the future
While we're unlikely to eliminate dps ramp up time for rogues altogether, we're sensitive to the fact that rogues http://www.euwowgold.fr/ require multiple methods to do so, when combo points do a pretty good job of handling that job. We will look at methods of streamlining rogue dps ramp time at some point in the future.
that it is what attracts them to healing
Well, raiding isn’t only hard for healers. In fact, most of the time the damage seems unhealable, it’s probably because it is intended to be unhealable and there is some aspect of the fight that po wow you’re missing or not executing as well as you could. While raiding healers have a lot of responsibility, it is our sense that most of them want that responsibility – that it is what attracts them to healing.
While we agree that we’ve had fights with too much “urgent dispelling” as you put it, we’ve tried to be better about that in more recent content. The dispels on Valiona and Theralion or Ascendant Council need to be done at the right moment, which is emphatically not as soon as the debuff appears. You need a smart dispeller for those mechanics, not a quick dispeller. We also had fairly “urgent interrupts” in Blackwing Descent and Bastion of Twilight, which are often the responsibility of melee, we continue to have situations where tanks need to respond immediately to something (say a tank swap or incoming adds), and we have mechanics where anyone who isn’t aware of their surroundings can wipe their whole group.
Blizzard Charity Auction Benefitting St. Jude
Want to own a piece of Blizzard Entertainment history? After a series of World of Warcraft infrastructure upgrades, wow gold we’ve preserved the retired HP server blades that once hosted many realms in our archives. In the near future a selection of these blades will be made available for auction, and the net proceeds will be donated to St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital.
Looking For Raid—Need Plus Updates
As a part of the on-going evaluation of Looking For Raid and the loot system, we have recently implemented a change to the Looking For Raid Need Plus system. Weapons, trinkets, rings, neck pieces, shields, offhand items, and the Robe of Glowing Stone are now class wow gold fr-restricted to their intended users. With the speed at which a Raid Finder group moves through a zone, we’ve found that it makes it challenging for players to evaluate loot decisions – by class restricting these items, we hope that the natural behavior will have a more positive set of results for everyone involved. This change will not apply to normal or heroic raid or dungeon loot rules.
Raid Finder and Need Plus are both very new systems, and we’re working to iterate on these systems rapidly to ensure that everyone has the best possible experience as we learn more about how players are using the system. Please keep in mind that this system is not considered complete and we have further plans to improve upon it within Mists of Pandaria.
If you looted an item from Looking for Raid which replaced another and you need Game Master assistance to recover your old item, please place a petition with the new item name, that you can no longer use it - and the old item name you need restored. For more information on the affected items, please visit the Customer Support forums here- http://us.battle.net/wow/en/forum/topic/3729953854#1
in terms of time investment
We'll continue making adjustments as necessary to keep 10- and 25-player raids within a relative alignment, in terms of time investment, difficulty and rewards. It may never be perfect, but we still see interest in both raid sizes for different reasons. And ultimately we'll continue designing 25-player raids as long as there are a decent number of guilds wow or interested in the format. We've seen no evidence as of yet that such interest is waning to any degree that should cause us great concern.
We tend to begin raid design around 25 players anyway before tuning for the various sizes and difficulties. That, when combined with our intent to carry on with 25-player Raid Finder group sizes, makes it very much worth our time to continue designing 25-player raids.
Regardless of what players' personal preferences or opinions are regarding the varied raid formats in World of Warcraft, we don't see removing options as a smart choice in the foreseeable future.
WoW Developer Reddit AMA Concluded
Update: 9/12/2012 1:45 p.m. PDT
The full AMA transcript is now available on the front page of our website, sorted according to each developer's responses.
--
Update: 9/11/2012 8:00 p.m. PDT
The AMA has concluded. Thank you to those of you who participated! We plan to post a transcript on our front page in the near future, but until then you can read the full AMA here: http://redd.it/zqm8d
--
It’s been two weeks since patch 5.0.4 was released and, with only two weeks to go until Mists of Pandaria takes the world by storm, we feel that this is the perfect time to give you access to the World of Warcraft development team. Tomorrow, Tuesday, September 11 beginning at 5:30 p.m. PDT, we’ll be conducting a live developer “Ask Me Anything” (AMA) on /r/WoW. I’ll be on-hand to host the chat and will have Lead Systems Designer Greg Street, Lead Quest Designer Dave Kosak, Lead Encounter Designer Ion Hazzikostas, and Game Director Tom Chilton available to field your questions.
We’ll spend at least an hour working to answer everything possible. So if you have any questions about patch 5.0.4, Mists of Pandaria, and anything else pertaining to World of Warcraft’s story, content, and systems design, come prepared! We want to cover as many different topics as possible and hope to address a wide array of inquiries from participants. We'll be choosing questions based on the information we can reasonably provide, and what kinds of answers we feel will be the most compelling and informative for the entire audience. Be sure to up-vote the questions you’d like to see addressed the most!
If you haven’t done so already, head to reddit and create your account. It’s easy and completely free. Also, keep in wow po mind that /r/WoW is not owned or operated by Blizzard Entertainment. The folks who maintain that subreddit are kind enough to host us, so please be respectful of the great resource they’ve set up for the community.
We hope to hear from you tomorrow!
ensure you get the drops you want or type of drops
Similarly if you're joining a pickup Raid you're at the mercy of the raid leader, who may hand his buddy a drop for no reason other than to unfairly take items from the raid group. This may not be usable advice for everyone, but: the best way to ensure you get the drops you want, or type of drops, is form a group yourself with friends/guildies you know and trust.
Back to the need/greed system though,euwowgold.fr it's essentially a limitation in it not being able to determine spec, and our CS department just can't play arbiter for every drop to determine who 'deserves' an item more than someone else. While it can be a frustrating situation, I hope at least that makes sense.
I really recommend reading the following articles. They have a ton of info on why things work the way they do:
Loot Settings
Ninja Looting: Blizzard's Stance
Scam Policy
That said, there have been ongoing discussions on at some point revisiting the need/greed system in dungeons. Until such a time and day as the dungeon loot system changes, be well aware that you'll be competing for loot, but if you have the resources - go with friends.
Kostenloses Blog bei Beeplog.de
Die auf Weblogs sichtbaren Daten und Inhalte stammen von
Privatpersonen. Beepworld ist hierfür nicht verantwortlich.
|
|
|
